mmorpgforum.net

mmorpgforum.net (https://www.mmorpgforum.net/index.php)
-   Suggestions (https://www.mmorpgforum.net/forumdisplay.php?f=147)
-   -   Pet peeve: Gimmick movies (https://www.mmorpgforum.net/showthread.php?t=1943)

Akrios 08-26-2007 05:47 AM

Pet peeve: Gimmick movies
 
These gimmick movies racking up dl's that took about 2 minutes to make

perfect example: I'm a shaman
http://www.warcraftmovies.com/movieview.php?id=43842

or

10k moonfire!
http://www.warcraftmovies.com/movieview.php?id=45402

or

3 man prince
http://www.warcraftmovies.com/movieview.php?id=45364

or

3 shot!

or soon to be released rogue solos ragnaros

pretty sure these vids go against everything that real video makers strive for...their success based upon provacative titles is pretty disgusting.

Would love if something could be done about these movies...such as screening titles more strictly, and greater awareness when a movie will attempt to succeed based on title alone.

Just my thoughts on it :P

yoshi245 08-26-2007 10:39 AM

3 Man prince is the only one in that list I even consider mildly relevant. The rest are all trash that doesn't deserve to even be on this site. Reason why? 3man prince's song was one I've heard before and actually laughed it, and it had at least some partial relevance to the title at hand. Never said 3 man wipe or 3 man kill.

10k Moonfire/I'm a shaman (or I'm a [class] videos by that guy are killing more braincells than the world's alcohol consumption rate)

There should be a category as a wall of shame section for these videos. Horrid content not worth a damn except for the immature fools who thinks it's worth their 2 cents. Go ahead, keep your trash, we don't want it.

Btcc22 08-26-2007 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akrios (Post 11379)
or soon to be released rogue solos ragnaros

I declined that, but I guess someone disagrees with me. ;)

I thought "I'm a Shaman" caused enough trouble. ;)

Valamir 08-26-2007 11:36 PM

All three are under a 3.0 rating, I would safely say they are not liked very well.

DlouBent 08-27-2007 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valamir (Post 11411)
All three are under a 3.0 rating, I would safely say they are not liked very well.


Still not a reason to remove em though.

But i most agree they shouldnt be approved in first place

Dwârv 08-27-2007 06:30 PM

...sometimes small stones produce big ripples...

DlouBent 08-27-2007 06:31 PM

Good one indeed Dwärv

Gedan 08-28-2007 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoshi245 (Post 11383)
...There should be a category as a wall of shame section for these videos. Horrid content not worth a damn except for the immature fools who thinks it's worth their 2 cents. Go ahead, keep your trash, we don't want it.

World of shame would be a fun way to furthermore point out that we in no way think this is quality movies.. We work hard not to release low quality movies, although sometimes there are movies who pass the screening process a bit too easy. Sometimes the movies are so bad we give them to you guys to be the judge.

The rating system is there for a reason and noone has to click a movie if it has rating below ~3 and that's a great thing, download+raiting are things you should as a prominent author should respect, you are nothing more than a Youtube jester if all you can achieve are downloads.

I can also mention we have taken more action towards a higher quality movie site and hopefully this will show in the upcoming weeks.

yoshi245 08-28-2007 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gedan (Post 11526)
World of shame would be a fun way to furthermore point out that we in no way think this is quality movies.. We work hard not to release low quality movies, although sometimes there are movies who pass the screening process a bit too easy. Sometimes the movies are so bad we give them to you guys to be the judge.

The rating system is there for a reason and noone has to click a movie if it has rating below ~3 and that's a great thing, download+raiting are things you should as a prominent author should respect, you are nothing more than a Youtube jester if all you can achieve are downloads.

I can also mention we have taken more action towards a higher quality movie site and hopefully this will show in the upcoming weeks.

Good to hear, hopefully the god awful gimmick movies that don't deserve to be viewed stay away from this site, it ruins any credibility here whatsoever. You have one of the most viewed movies listed yet 90% of the people who watched it would rather view a rickroll or something worse than that. The only actual credit I give is to the authors who make them by spending their time on the video. Maybe if they had some decency as to the content they put people wouldn't be so judgemental about their crap(ie: me).

DlouBent 08-28-2007 12:44 PM

Quote:

World of shame would be a fun way to furthermore point out that we in no way think this is quality movies.. We work hard not to release low quality movies, although sometimes there are movies who pass the screening process a bit too easy. Sometimes the movies are so bad we give them to you guys to be the judge.

The rating system is there for a reason and noone has to click a movie if it has rating below ~3 and that's a great thing, download+raiting are things you should as a prominent author should respect, you are nothing more than a Youtube jester if all you can achieve are downloads.

I can also mention we have taken more action towards a higher quality movie site and hopefully this will show in the upcoming weeks.
WOOT WOOT :D


Forum time (GMT) 12:55 AM

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.