Quote:
Originally Posted by Olibith
That makes sense. I also think about the average final rating.
Imagine for exemple a video, funny as hell, made voluntarily in a "South Park" quality way.
Would it be fair to rate it 2.5, even if it's the most entertaining thing you've ever seen ?
Different ratings criterions for each category could be an idea too.
|
No it wouldn't be fair, but it still would be logical because of the criterion. That's the problem with the average rating. As an example: I loved a PvP movie, it got some sick editing, high quality and original music. However the PvP was terrible, even I could perform better. 1/5/5/5. While I would like to give the movie and a/v on 4,9.
I'd say the best way is that you rate after some different criterion and then check how much a/v score you want. On a scale from 1-10 for example. The movies are then parted up in "Rated for high editing", "Rated for high xxxxx". You get my point?
I know it's like going back to the old system, but you will also add the ability to see more exactly what every person thought about the different criterion.