|
Register | Projects | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
04-30-2008, 10:48 PM | #1 | |||||||
Initiate
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
|
How To Properly Rate Movies
Have you ever stopped to wonder why any first-kill movie is automatically granted 5 stars on quality and editing? Or how the average Joe receive almost as good a score as the semi-professional who has dedicated months on a project? Rating has become a phenomenon of cyber-social status rather than an actual evaluation of the work at hand, and the pace at which stars are awarded seems to match the financial hyperinflation in Zimbabwe.
Some of you could not care less about these imbalances, some deny their existence, and again others are oblivious to fact that there is actually a point to the rating. Hopefully there are also some of you who want to be able to show your appreciation for a good piece of work, and actually rate a movie based on the given perimeters. Regardless, I have devised a little walkthrough on what I think are crucial factors in rating movies, which in terms should be a hint at how to make them. Why bother? Well, your effort will help make WCM a better place, which - seeing that you spend time on it - should be in your interest, and as a movie maker it will help you understand what to aim for and how to aim for it, which ultimately makes you better at what you do, but also increases the chance that others will like it. Surely a win/win then? Read on to find out. But before you do though, it needs to be said that you should not see this as a final product, but a work in progress, that – with your help – will develop over time to provide the best, most up to date information. Much of the following is inevitably affected by my personal opinions (that’s the whole concept of rating) but I hope you can make some use of it. Content Probably the most important aspect of a movie (and at the same time the most difficult one to generalize on) is its content. Various elements depending on genre and theme will be of importance here, but a few should be universal; namely the ones that makes you laugh and the ones that makes you excited. The fun-factor. Never underestimate the value of a good laugh. Most of us watch movies for the sheer pleasure of it, others do it to learn and improve, but no matter what the setting is, a movie always gets better when it's actually fun to watch - and being fun, ladies and gentlemen, often involves humour. When rating a movie's content then, simply keep in mind to what extent it is presented in a way that makes you laugh, smile and cheer. Quote:
Quote:
Creativity As this name says, this is about to what extend a movie brings something refreshing to the community, be it on an editing level, music-wise or in the content. Not in the sense that it hasn’t been seen before (the first Twin movies wasn’t exactly creative, was it), but in using any of the above aspect in a new manner that breaks with tradition or opens up for possibilities the viewer had not thought of. Originality. I like to think that everyone watching a movie do so because he/she hopes to see something new, from a new perspective or from another angle, so obviously originality has to be important – for the ones making the movies as well as those rating them. Achieving this can be done in many ways, even within relatively static settings (say level 70 arena’s): one could add off-topic clips in between the fights, show fights in a stylish way without UI displayed, or try to come up with a story of why this character seeks to eradicate others – your imagination sets the limits. When I rate movies on creativity this is an absolutely crucial element. It doesn’t have to be as groundbreaking as the below examples to be original, but you get the idea. Quote:
Quote:
Editing This is typically where it gets hairy, and where it is difficult for me not to bloat about my own preferences. Generally speaking there has to be a balance between editing and content so that the content is never subdued or distorted by the means to present it. Editing is a supplement to what’s going on, a way to make what you see more edible and to guide the viewer through the content for either demonstrational or entertaining reasons – it should never be the driving force. Consistency. More often than not I see movie makers failing on their editing because they’re either too eager to demonstrate what they’ve learned, or because they somehow got the insanely stupid idea, that the more, the merrier. As a consequence, poorly edited movies often display a large array of different editing tools with little or no connection, which gives the viewer that very un-theme’ish feel. If you have a fetish for turning the image red upon critting your opponents, then I guess that’s alright, but by God I shall haunt your nightmares if you then show half the crits in blue. If zooming in on your character every time he/she makes a killing blow is your thing, then stick to that concept. Why is this important, you may ask? Because every time you introduce a new form of editing the viewer is forced to focus on that, rather than what’s actually going on, which is mostly a bad thing - unless of course you find the zooming effect to be more important than the boss encounter. Quote:
Quote:
A/V Quality This aspect is commonly overlooked, which is awkward seeing that it is the easiest one to determine, and the one where you get to be somewhat objective and therefore most fair. For obvious reasons it is divided into two. Audio quality. Genre and feel: Contrary to what seems to be the general consensus, rating the sound (usually music) should be based on whether or not it follows the content in a plausible way, and not the number of times it has been used elsewhere. If the song matches the content it does its job well, okay? Okay. The story-line movies that depict the development of a set of characters usually call for the subtle and dramatical music genre which is often found in the Hollywood soundtrack section. Similarly, a fast paced, combat-heavy movie will often call for more fast-paced and loud music. Rhythm: The second aspect of audio rating is to what extent the rhythm and feel dictates the content, for example the timing of shifting camera angles, or the timing of various editing tools. Use of it should be employed carefully, but when done correctly it adds intensity to the movie and anticipation for what’s to come. A very useful tool in keeping the viewer interested, and thereby something that should inspire to a better rating. Quote:
On a side note, different people have different connections as well as different opinions to how much image quality matters. I am one of those who believe that a message poorly presented is only half a message, but to oblige to those who do not think that way it never hurts to publish both a low and a high quality release. I have even seen one bloke publish with different aspect ratios, and found that a nifty detail - especially if you are sitting behind a widescreen monitor. All these things contribute to a better rating, and compared to the work put into the actual movie this should really be standard procedure for every movie maker. In closing... I have probably forgotten a bunch of things, and there is a good chance I have also been rambling on about some aspect that are not quite so important, so if you made it this far I would like to give you my compliments. I do not claim to have any unique knowledge on the topic, nor do I work in the field, so if I have missed something or gotten something wrong, make sure you are the first to tell me! Other than that I hope you now have a better picture about how to rate movies, and that you learned a few things that will help should you ever want to make one. Best regards Abyzz Last edited by Abyzz : 05-02-2008 at 07:24 AM. |
|||||||
05-01-2008, 09:27 AM | #2 |
Hall of Fame member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 76
|
Literally 75% plus of people who rate completely ignore the ratings category system. This is party to do with because, well, people just do coz they're a bit ya know ;-P dumb. Also people if they like something tend to just max it out with 5's. Which again isn't very helpful at all. BUT, a good chunk of the reasons why all this happens is because the ratings system is flawed imo. I know it's damn hard to come up with a good system, but the one on WCM simply just doesn't fit for a lot of movies and kind of forces you to just ignore it completely.
Also, you can't search by ratings category. It would be mighty cool if I could for example search by editing rating, and see all the best edited movies listed, regardless of if they have any PvP skills or whatever. It would be cool to have an open debate about a new ratings system, like a discussion on what a new one should be. But again this is flawed because it means you guys have to write a new one, and someone convert the old one into the new one, plus no one reads these forums anyways so everyone will most likely scream and freak out when things change. Catch22 situation! hehe so perhaps we just have to live with it as it is maybe. Last edited by Hacky : 05-01-2008 at 09:31 AM. |
05-01-2008, 09:32 AM | #3 |
Initiate
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
|
Rightly so, yet I've not come across a movie where I couldn't point out a couple of flaws in regards to the above perimeters, so it's mostly up to you as a rater. Unless you choose to ignore the possibilities I'd say WCM offer very good rating opportunities. My only major regret so far is that skill isn't part of rating, even though it's absolutely crucial to whether or not the movie is a success. I've made a topic about that, but things run a bit slow around these boards..
|
05-01-2008, 09:36 AM | #4 |
Hall of Fame member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 76
|
Yeah, same, I mean if I could add just TWO things it would be the ability to rate skill, because most of the categories are bias to the actual MOVIE MAKING skill itself and not the player/content skill/fun factor, which again makes people just ignore it. But a way to rate more the content itself, and also secondly the ability to search by category like how you can for download numbers or over all rating.
|
05-01-2008, 10:03 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 267
|
Howdy -
Not the first try to give people a guideline on how to rate,but sure the best one so far. Like Hacky allready mentioned,chances are that this one will drown into the sea of oblivion like many others,just because people don't come to the forum. So first of all:This should be linked on the frontpage. Second: sticky please. The rating system will be discussed for ever and ever, due to it's weak points, and I doubt that we will have an improvement one way or the other, but I want to repeat the suggestion I threw out once or twice: People give five stars on movies just because they like it, and they give a damn about the rating categories (example:the clip where the paladin wipes a raid,forgot the exact name atm.Its funny,but creativity,editing and A/V quality a definitly no 5-stars.Still its collecting 5 star ratings like crazy). Imho it might help to add a category that fills this point:Something like "I liked the movie 1 - 5",a general rating in a way...Maybe then people start to pay more attention to the other categories. Thanx for the efford,Abyzz. Regards
__________________
RunningDwârv productions Last edited by Dwârv : 05-01-2008 at 10:07 AM. |
05-01-2008, 11:07 AM | #6 |
Initiate
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
|
For those who don't put too much effort into rating accurately (hey, it's a game) I definitely understand where they're coming from. If you can't rate the things you really think matters (which, being the arena-era that it is, most often revolves around character skills) you are not able to give representative feedback on your experience - so why bother trying to? I've seen movies that were entertaining purely because they displayed unparalleled reflexes or clever teamwork, but which I've been forced to rate as average movies because of image quality, lack of editing or whatnot. Great movies, but under the circumstances downrated non the less.
|
05-01-2008, 01:47 PM | #7 |
Hall of Fame member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 76
|
For sure, I mean let me use extreme examples, a movie like Leeroy, one of the most downloaded movies in WoW, zero skill, far from it, it's anti-skill, but it's funny as HELL! It has crap AV quality, it has no skill, no editing skill either, nothing, it is just a simply funny, but it always gets maxed out ratings in all categories hehe. As do all movies of this type.
Then we have another end of the spectrum, like BaronSoosdon's movies. Again, zero skill in game play or PvP or PvE, yet EXTREME best of the best skills in editing, creativity and AV quality and encoding. And skill in like editing the game exploiting and hacking it for art. How do you rate that shit? Then you have the 100000000000000000000 x trillions of PvP movies which WCM is 99% about, most have no editing skills at all, and dubious vision quality, but again how do you rate them, all the categories are movie making categories all about movie making skill. Yet again, we see 5/5/5/5/5/5/5/5 always yet all PvP movies are basically the same, MOVIE wise, it is only in PvP skill they vary. |
05-01-2008, 02:04 PM | #8 |
Initiate
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
|
I'd tend to keep Leeroy out of the equation - what happened back then was a cyber-cult based on nothing apparent save perhaps the lack of a word for that action. And one must admit, a "Leeroy" is quite well elaborated at this point.
The BS movie genre I actually find quite easy to rate. The only difference is that the content usually doesn't follow any logical story-line, and that mostly there's no 'message' embedded in it. A/V quality is usually high, as is editing, and creativity and content depends on whether or not the movie succeeds at combining these aspects well. "The Device Has Been Modified" that I linked to brought something new to WCM through its funny time-line at the intro as well as the combination of Portal and WoW, which made it - to me - a very creative piece of work, while the content actually summarized the entire Portal game in a meaningful yet different way. The arena section which, precisely as you say is 99% of all movies, is where I start pulling my hair out. Partly because any attempt of fair rating is blown to pieces, and partly because most of the submitted movies are so unbelievably unoriginal that I find I have to strap myself onto the chair not to bang my head against the wall repeatedly. What's needed right now is more story-telling in the PvP segment. Add some of the Tales of the Past goodness to an arena movie and make it more than just a number's game of mana and insignia's. |
05-01-2008, 02:12 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 267
|
Basically, in my humble opinion, we should stick to the ratin categories and rate the movie according to them.Meaning "Leeroy"would would bite the dust and The Barons movies would collect 5 star ratings like the raters get paid for it.
Thats why I ask for this "overall" rating category.There you could vote "Leeroy" 5 stars,regardless of what you voted the other cat's.I know it's too much to ask for,but it would be perfect to see 2 ratings on each movie.One as a conclusion of the rating cat's we have so far, and one resulting out of the "general"-rating. Until then, I don't hesitate to give low ratings when a movie deserves them.Even when it's against the mainstream.Mainly because anithing different - like 5 stars on a movie like "A WoW paldin wipes the raid" - would be a slap in the face of the moviemakers who really put efford in their work and come up with something special (like Tamzin,e.g.) P.S.:Anybody else with an opinion around here..?...just anybody..?
__________________
RunningDwârv productions Last edited by Dwârv : 05-01-2008 at 02:19 PM. |
05-01-2008, 04:15 PM | #10 | |
Hall of Fame member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
But to reply to something u said... the problem is, logistically speaking I mean, coz I've had this debate ad-infinitum with Uzbeki and Baron many times in the past, they must hate my whine spam hehe, but anyway, the problem is if you rate something low in one category it pulls the over all rating down a lot so it's really hard to find rating categories which weave together seamlessly yet while also giving you details about which aspects are good or bad. It's far from an easy task to make THE perfect ratings system unfortunately. I mean take my new movie for example, the Illidan tactical guide one. It has no 'skill' really in game play, I mean ok so we're killing Illidan but anyone can do that, so one could in theory rate it high in movie making skills and low in 'game play' skills categories, thus making the over all rating really low, so people would not bother to watch it. But as we seen what people do is rate 5 in everything, if they like it hehe. I wish they wouldn't though coz it gives much more constructive feedback if you rate constructively. But u can ONLY do that if u do that for EVERY movie coz u can't rate one movie 5 coz it made u laugh and is 10 megs long then a 1 gig art movie rate it 4 because you felt the way motion blur was used was too similar to his last master piece. It needs consistency. I mean I think I have never rated a Baron movie 5 in all categories, coz if I DID it tells him 'this is perfection, u can do no better, this is your master piece' so I don't want to give him 5... YET Last edited by Hacky : 05-01-2008 at 04:23 PM. |
|